Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)

On April 18, 2023, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) announced its plan to maintain access to COVID-19 vaccines and treatment following the end of the Public Health Emergency on May 11, 2023. The “HHS Bridge Access Program for COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatments” is a $1.1 billion public-private partnership between HHS, pharmacy chains, and drug manufacturers. Essentially, HHS and drug manufacturers will provide COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, like Paxlovid and Lagevrio, to pharmacy chains, which will administer them to individuals without insurance at no cost.

Under the program, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), will use its existing authority under Section 317 of the Public Health Service Act to purchase and distribute COVID-19 vaccines and allocate them through its network of 64 state and local health departments, as well as through Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) supported health centers.Continue Reading HHS Proposes Bridge Access Program for COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatments

In a notice published on April 7, 2022, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the division of HHS that manages the distribution and oversight of CARES Act Provider Relief Funds (PRFs), requested comments from stakeholders on proposed changes to its Information Collection Request (ICR) Form that it will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The approved ICR uses an OMB form that is set to expire on January 1, 2023, so HRSA is requesting comments before submitting revisions to OMB. This is the first opportunity for providers who were subject to the first two PRF reporting periods (Period 1 and Period 2) to comment on the reporting program and provide feedback on requirements related to those reports. In addition to revising the PRF reporting form, HRSA is looking to add reporting for the American Rescue Plan (ARP) rural provider program to the ICR.

The ARP rural provider program was put in place by Congress to provide payments to providers and suppliers who served rural Medicaid, CHIP and Medicare beneficiaries from January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020. The ARP Rural plan is distinct from the PRF, but it has similar reporting requirements and uses the PRF reporting portal for applications.
Continue Reading HRSA asks for comment on provider relief fund and ARP rural reporting requirements

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through its Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) office, is taking action to recoup CARES Act funding from health care providers who received relief funding but did not meet the reporting requirements set by HRSA.

To receive COVID-19 relief funding from HRSA pursuant to the CARES Act, providers had to attest to compliance with the terms and conditions promulgated by HRSA. Recipients of the funds must agree to the terms and conditions specific to the Phase in which they received funding distribution. Those terms and conditions evolved over time, with different reporting periods for each wave of funding. Under all waves, failure to report to HRSA regarding the use or allocation of received funds constitutes noncompliance with HRSA’s terms and conditions and requires repayment of the funds.

Providers who completed reporting, but reported unused funds, will have 30 days from the end of their specific reporting deadline to return all unused funds.
Continue Reading Provider relief fund reporting: HRSA to recoup funds from providers who didn’t meet deadlines

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has released two proposed rules intended to increase the availability of organs for transplantation and improve the accountability of organ procurement organizations (OPOs), in conformance with President Trump’s Executive Order on Advancing American Kidney Health.

First, the Health Resources and Services Administration has proposed expanding the

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) has announced that it will implement its January 5, 2017 340B drug pricing program rule on January 1, 2019.  The oft-delayed final rule addresses:  (i) the calculation of the 340B “ceiling price” that may be charged to covered entities; (ii) the substantive standards applicable to civil monetary penalties

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is once again delaying the effective date of its January 5, 2017 rule on 340B drug pricing program ceiling price calculation and civil monetary penalties (CMPs). Specifically, under a final rule published June 5, 2018, HRSA is pushing back the 340B ceiling price/CMP rule’s effective date for an

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) has adopted its proposal to delay the effective date of its final rule revising the calculation of the 340B “ceiling price” that may be charged to covered entities and related civil money penalties.  As previously reported, while implementation of the January 5, 2017 rule was already delayed

The Trump Administration is proposing to once again push back the effective date of a January 2017 final rule making changes to the calculation of the 340B “ceiling price” that may be charged to covered entities and related civil money penalties. As previously reported, while implementation of this rule has already been delayed until

Changes to the rules governing calculation of the ceiling price and application of civil monetary penalties under the 340B drug pricing program will not be implemented until October 1, 2017 under a rule published by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) on May 19, 2017.  The rule initially was scheduled to go into effect

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is delaying the effective date of its January 5, 2017 final rule on the calculation of the ceiling price and application of civil monetary penalties (CMPs) under the 340B drug pricing program until May 22, 2017 – with a longer delay being contemplated.  The January 5, 2017 final

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) has published a final rule to implement civil money penalty (CMP) provisions added to section 340B of the Public Health Service Act under the Affordable Care Act.  In particular, the final rule addresses:  (i) the calculation of the 340B “ceiling price” that may be charged to covered entities;

As has been the tradition for incoming administrations, the Trump Administration has ordered a regulatory freeze and review of final rules published by the Obama Administration that had not yet gone into effect.  In a January 20, 2017 memo to the heads of executive departments and agencies, Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff

In response to concerns about potential future shortages of direct-care workers to provide hands-on long-term services and supports (LTSS), the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report examining federal and state data available on the paid direct-care workforce (e.g., home health aides, psychiatric aides, nursing assistants, and personal care aides).  While a variety of

On April 19, 2016, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is publishing a notice reopening for 30 days the comment period on its June 17, 2015 proposed rule entitled “340B Drug Pricing Program Ceiling Price and Manufacturer Civil Monetary Penalties Regulation.”  While comments may be submitted on any aspect of the proposed

On August 28, 2015, the Health Services Resources Administration (HRSA) published long-awaited 340B Drug Pricing Program Omnibus Guidance.  Although many aspects of the notice reiterate previous HRSA guidance, several elements will generate significant debate among program stakeholders regarding the scope of the 340B program, particularly because of its potential to narrow the scope of

On June 17, 2015, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) issued a proposed rule to implement civil money penalty (CMP) provisions added to section 340B of the Public Health Service Act as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The proposed rule addresses three primary issues: (i) the calculation of the 340B “ceiling price&rdquo

On May 8, 2015, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) published a final rule to implement the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act (HOPE Act), which modifies standards related to Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) acquisition of organs from individuals known to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Under the final rule, organs

Today the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) officially requested White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review of new “omnibus guidelines” on the 340B drug discount program. While the guidelines are not yet available to the public, the document will presumably fulfill HRSA’s pledge last year to address “key policy issues raised by

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is seeking White House review of its proposed rule to implement new Affordable Care Act 340B drug discount program enforcement authorities and pricing policies. More than four years after soliciting comments on the planned rulemaking, the HRSA proposal will address its authority to impose civil monetary penalties (CMPs)

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) has officially withdrawn from Office of Management and Budget review a long-awaited proposed rule to establish comprehensive requirements for entities and manufacturers participating in the 340B Drug Pricing Program. HRSA notes in a web posting that it intends to issue proposed guidance for notice and comment in