Shortly after Connecticut’s 2023 legislative session kicked off, Governor Ned Lamont announced a series of policy initiatives aimed at reducing health care costs and undertaken in collaboration with the Connecticut Hospital Association. “An Act Protecting Patients and Prohibiting Unnecessary Health Care Costs” (“the Act”), which was passed by the Connecticut Legislature in early June and signed into law by Governor Lamont in late June, implements some of those initiatives. Among other things, the Act targets pharmaceutical marketing practices and imposes extensive reporting requirements. These provisions apply to “pharmaceutical manufacturers” and come into effect on October 1, 2023.

Broadly, the provisions require “pharmaceutical manufacturers” that employ “pharmaceutical representatives” to register annually with the Department of Consumer Protection (“DCP”) as “pharmaceutical marketing firms” and provide annual reports to DCP containing various information about their employed “pharmaceutical representatives.” The provisions also require “pharmaceutical representatives” to disclose specific information to prescribing practitioners and pharmacists and provides DCP with the authority to impose penalties for non-compliance.

The nuance lives in the Act’s definitions, and several key questions remain open, including to what extent the Act applies to medical device and technology manufacturers.Continue Reading New Connecticut Law Targets Drug and Device Manufacturers who Employ Sales Representatives for Additional Scrutiny

As a reminder, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is holding a two-day public meeting on November 9 and 10, 2016 regarding “Manufacturer Communications Regarding Unapproved Uses of Approved or Cleared Medical Products.”  The meeting comes at a time where recent litigation has raised hot-button issues regarding the relationship between FDA, off-label use of

Last February, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked for public feedback on a proposed research study related to prescription drug television advertisements. In a notice published in the Federal Register on January 13, 2015, FDA announced its intention to continue to move forward with the proposed study. Specifically, the notice announced that

This post was written by Jillian W. Riley. On June 6, 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a draft guidance addressing the distribution of new risk information to health care providers (HCPs) and health care entities (HCEs). The draft guidance defines “new risk information” as “information that becomes available after a drug is marketed that rebuts or mitigates information about a risk already identified in the approved labeling or otherwise refines risk information in the approved labeling in a way that does not indicate great seriousness of the risk.” The draft guidance is not intended to address risk information that is newly identified, but that which was not available at the time FDA approved the labeling. Acknowledging the evolving nature of a drug’s safety profile, the draft guidance is aimed at helping sponsors better communicate “new risk information” in order to allow HCPs and HCEs make the best decision for each patient.
Continue Reading FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Communicating New Risk Information about an Approved Drug Product – Comment Opportunity

In a notice published in the Federal Register on February 18, 2014, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked for feedback on a proposed research study related to prescription drug television advertisements. The study, Disclosure Regarding Additional Risks in Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Prescription Drug Television (TV) Advertisements (Ads), would investigate the impact of limiting the

As reported on our Life Sciences Legal Update blog, the FDA has issued draft guidance addressing the unique challenges of drug promotion in the age of social media. Specifically, the draft guidance addresses how to submit interactive promotional media for postmarket review.  Comments on the document, “Draft Guidance for Industry on Fulfilling Regulatory

This post was written by Erin A. Janssen. FDA has released draft guidance for industry entitled “Direct-to-Consumer Television Advertisements—FDAAA DTC Television Ad Pre-Dissemination Review Program.”  The draft guidance is intended to assist sponsors of human prescription drug products, including biological drug products, who are subject to the pre-dissemination review of television advertisements

On January 17, 2012 the FDA announced an opportunity for public comment on its Healthcare Professional Survey of Prescription Drug Promotion. This survey is designed to explore the opinions and perceptions of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants with regard to the promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and healthcare providers. FDA is inviting

The FDA released a guidance document entitled ‘‘Product Name Placement, Size, and Prominence in Advertising and Promotional Labeling’’ on January 25, 2012. The guidance is intended to clarify for applicants the requirements for product name placement, size, prominence, and frequency in promotional labeling and advertising for prescription human and animal drugs and biological products. The

This post was also written by Erin Janssen. With only days to spare in 2011, and after two years of anticipation, FDA’s Internet and social media policy is finally starting to emerge. On December 27, 2011, FDA announced the availability of draft guidance entitled “Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Information About Prescription Drugs

This post was written by Paul Sheives. FDA has announced plans to conduct a study entitled “Clinical Benefit Information in Professional Labeling and Direct-to-Consumer Print Advertisements for Prescription Drugs.”  The purpose of the study is to: (1) understand how physicians process clinical efficacy information and how they interpret approved product label information;

This post was written by Paul Sheives. FDA seeks comments on the design of a study entitled “Experimental Study: Effect of Promotional Offers in Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Prescription Drug Print Advertisements on Consumer Product Perceptions.” The study intends to assess the effect that promotional offers (e.g., free trial offers, discounts, money-back guarantees,

This post was also written by Areta Kupchyk.

On May 11, 2010, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched a new initiative – the “Bad Ad Program” – designed to educate health care practitioners about their role in ensuring that prescription drug advertising and promotion is truthful, and not misleading. With the launch of

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is seeking comments on a proposed rule to amend the requirements for direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements as mandated under the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA). The change in regulations would require DTC television and broadcast advertisements of prescription drugs to place the “major statement” in a