Affordable Care Act (ACA)

While previous broad Republican efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have failed, the GOP tax bill cleared by Congress today has succeeded in effectively repealing the ACA’s individual health insurance mandate.  By way of background, the ACA established a penalty for failure to maintain health insurance coverage that provides at least minimum

The House Ways and Means Committee has approved by a 24-13 vote HR 849, Protecting Seniors’ Access to Medicare Act, to repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). The IPAB was established by the ACA to submit Medicare spending plans to Congress if projected spending growth exceeds specified targets. Under the ACA, future IPAB’s proposals

A Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) decision to discontinue ACA cost-sharing reduction (CSR) payments to insurers offering policies through ACA exchanges has cleared its first legal hurdle, with a U.S. district court declining to block the Administration’s action on an emergency basis.

On October 12, 2017, the Trump Administration declared it was “immediately” ending CSR payments, which are paid directly to insurance companies to offset the reduced cost sharing plans must offer to some enrollees based on income. The Trump Administration asserts that the payments are not legal because it claims Congress did not appropriate funds for CSR payments (unlike ACA premium tax credits, for which funds are specifically appropriated). The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) previously forecast that discontinuing CSR payments would trigger increased premiums for “silver plans” (which enrollees generally must purchase to qualify for CSR subsidies), which in turn would increase both average per-capita subsidies and the number of individuals receiving subsidies. In fact, the CBO estimated that cutting off CSR payments would result in a net $194 billion increase in the federal deficit from 2017 through 2026.

The Trump decision was immediately challenged in federal district court by 18 Democratic state attorneys general, who sought an emergency ruling requiring continuation of the CSR payments while the suit was pending. In a decision filed on October 25, 2017, Judge Vince Chhabria of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California declined to provide emergency injunctive relief. Although the court determined that ACA “required the federal government to pay the insurance companies in advance for [the cost-sharing] reductions,” and that the ACA “authorized the costs-sharing reductions program and the CSR payments to the insurers,” the court noted that the ACA “did not explicitly make a permanent appropriation for the CSR payments to the insurance companies.” The Court observed that “[o]n the merits, it’s a close and complicated question,” but the Judge determined that “it appears initially that the Trump Administration has the stronger legal argument.”
Continue Reading Trump Administration Plan to Cut Off CSR Payments Withstands First Court Review

As legislative efforts to replace or reform the Affordable Care Act (ACA) sputter, President Trump has issued an executive order seeking to expand affordable health insurance choices, “to the extent consistent with law.” While the executive order itself does not modify current ACA statutory or regulatory requirements, it signals the Administration’s intent to:

  • Facilitate the

The Trump Administration has issued interim final rules to make it easier for employers and health insurance plans to qualify for an exemption from ACA rules mandating coverage of contraceptive services without cost sharing on the basis of religious or moral objections. The extent to which group health plans must cover contraceptive services in cases

The latest Republican Congressional attempt to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has foundered, as three Republican senators announced they will join Democratic senators in opposing the “Graham-Cassidy” repeal plan.

Very broadly, Graham-Cassidy would, among other things:

  • Eliminate the penalties and mandates that individuals buy insurance and certain employers offer insurance;

The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions is holding a series of hearings in September 2017 to focus on “actions Congress should take to stabilize and strengthen the individual health insurance markets.” Specifically, a September 6 hearing will feature five state insurance commissioners, and second hearing on September 7 will include testimony from

A multi-year Republican drive to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) hit a significant roadblock in the early hours of July 28, 2017 when the Senate was unable to muster the votes to pass any form of ACA repeal or repeal/replace legislation – even a stripped down, so-called “skinny” version of HR 1628 offered by

In a tacit acknowledgement of the hurdles ahead for enactment of Affordable Care Act (ACA) repeal/replace legislation, the Trump Administration is soliciting suggestion for changes that could be made within the current legal framework to improve health insurance markets and meet Administration reform goals. In particular, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is

President Trump has released his FY 2018 budget proposal, which the Administration dubs “A New Foundation for American Greatness.”  The proposed budget – which received a generally chilly reception on Capitol Hill – offers a mixed bag for the health care industry.  On the one hand, a document summarizing the Department of Health

Although President Trump and House Republican leaders held a White House Rose Garden ceremony to celebrate House passage of legislation to partially repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the prospects for actual enactment of the bill into law are highly uncertain. The American Health Care Act of 2017 (HR 1628), approved by the House May

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has published a final rule intended to help improve the risk pool and stabilize the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Insurance Exchanges for 2018 – even as CMS contends that consumers “have faced double-digit premium increases, fewer plans to choose from, and a market that continues to be threatened

The House of Representatives has adjourned for a two-week recess without a full House vote on the Republican party’s signature legislation — the American Health Care Act (AHCA) — to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Since Republican leaders pulled the AHCA from House consideration on March 24, 2017 due to insufficient support,

The House of Representatives is moving ahead on the Republican plan -– the American Health Care Act (AHCA) – that would repeal and replace major provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). On March 16, 2017, the House Budget Committee approved sending the bill to the full House as part of fiscal year 2017 budget reconciliation bill, and a vote is expected later this week. The fate of the bill is uncertain in the face of united Democratic opposition to the plan and the objections of various ideological and regional factions within the Republican party. The political challenge has been complicated by a Congressional Budget Office (CBO)/Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate that the AHCA would result in 14 million more uninsured individuals in 2018, rising to 24 million by 2026. The CBO and JCT project that more of half of the coverage loss would be a result of the steep –$880 billion – proposed cut in federal Medicaid outlays, which would result in 14 million fewer Medicaid enrollees by 2026. And yet one of the fundamental disputes among Republican lawmakers is whether the ACA’s Medicaid expansion should be phased out sooner than the legislation now contemplates (2020), or whether additional protections should be provided in Medicaid expansion states.

Due to complex budget reconciliation rules, the AHCA concentrates on tax and Medicaid spending provisions. The AHCA would repeal the tax penalties enforcing the ACA mandates that most individuals obtain health insurance coverage and that certain employers offer employees coverage meeting minimum essential coverage standards, retroactive to those impacted by the penalty in 2016. Instead, to encourage healthier people to purchase insurance, the AHCA would require insurers to impose a 30% premium penalty for individuals who have not maintained continuous insurance coverage. Insurers also generally would be permitted to charge older individuals five times more than younger individuals (instead of the current 3 to 1 cap), beginning in 2018. Furthermore, the AHCA also would replace ACA insurance premium subsidies with refundable tax credits beginning in 2020 and establish a Patient and State Stability Fund intended to lower patient costs and stabilize state markets. The CBO/JCT estimate that, by 2026, the average subsidy under the AHCA would be about half of the average subsidy under current law. As noted, the AHCA also includes significant Medicaid cuts in the form of reduced enhanced federal matching and limits on growth in per-enrollee payments starting in 2020. In light of the expected decrease in the number of individuals with Medicaid coverage, the AHCA would eliminate cuts in disproportionate share hospital spending imposed under the ACA, and thus increase outlays by $31 billion. The AHCA also would repeal various ACA taxes, including the medical device tax, the prescription drug manufacturers’ tax, the health insurance provider fee, and the surtax on high-income taxpayer’s net investment income. Overall, CBO/JCT estimate that the AHCA would decrease federal spending by $1.2 trillion and reduce federal revenues by $883 billion, resulting in a $337 billion reduction to federal deficits, over the 2017-2026 period.
Continue Reading House GOP Moving Ahead on Controversial ACA Repeal & Replace Bill; First of Three Planned Phases of Health Reform

At the same time Republican Congressional leaders are attempting to develop legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA), CMS has published a proposed rule that is intended to help stabilize the Affordable Insurance Exchanges for 2018. According to CMS, “[t]he health and competitiveness of the Exchanges, as well as the individual and

The House and Senate have approved a budget resolution (S.Con.Res. 3) providing instructions to Congressional committees on the federal spending framework for fiscal years 2017 through 2026. Notably, the resolution would enable the Senate to repeal provisions of the ACA pertaining to spending and revenues on a simple majority vote, without opportunity for

President Donald Trump’s first official act in office was to sign an executive order declaring it the policy of his Administration to seek prompt repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) – but in the meantime, he calls for executive branch action “to minimize the unwarranted economic and regulatory burdens of the Act.”  Specifically, Trump’s

On December 16, 2016, CMS released its Affordable Care Act (ACA) Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters final rule and the final Annual Letter to Issuers for the 2018 plan year. Notably, the final rule revises the risk adjustment methodology to “further promote stable premiums in the individual and small group markets.” The final risk

CMS has published a final rule that implements various Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) eligibility, appeals, and related administrative changes under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that were proposed in January 22, 2013 but not included in a July 15, 2013 rule finalizing selected provisions. According to CMS, the rule will support “modernization

Observers are digesting what the Trump Administration will mean for the health care and life sciences industry.  Forecasting is more challenging for this incoming Administration than most given the relatively sparse policy details released during the campaign and the lack of a government service record to examine for clues.  Today President-elect Trump’s transition team released a one-page statement on health care policy, but many questions remain.  Nevertheless, we offer below our initial observations and issues to watch in the months to come.

  • Potential Sea Change. Uncertainty is, as some like to say, the “obvious comment” that characterizes the whole prospective Trump Administration.  Other than an intended “repeal and replacement” of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), President-elect Trump has provided relatively few details on a proposed health care agenda.  Until these policies are fleshed-out, expect an environment where some business decisions and investments may be delayed, with a resulting impact on merger and acquisition activity. That said, other transactions may become more likely, as the threat of new restrictions under a Clinton administration are removed, along with the prospect of potential regulatory relief under a Republican-controlled federal government.
  • Affordable Care Act Repeal and Replacement.  Trump has repeatedly indicated his desire to repeal and replace the ACA, including a vow to summon Congress into a special session for this task.  If the law is repealed, however, what would take its place, and how would Congress address the roughly 20 million Americans currently covered in some way under the ACA (and the potential rise in uncompensated care costs that also would result)?  Despite the call for repeal, certain parts of the law are popular. For instance, President-elect Trump noted on the campaign trail that he was in support of the ACA’s prohibition against the use of pre-existing health conditions to deny coverage (or as a basis for premium-setting).  Other proposals offered by Trump as candidate include allowing for the sale of health insurance across state lines as long as plans comply with state requirements, various tax benefits, and more transparency in health care pricing.  In today’s policy statement, President-elect Trump added support for high-risk pools, which he characterizes as “a proven approach to ensuring access to health insurance coverage for individuals who have significant medical expenses and who have not maintained continuous coverage.”  Congressional Republicans have offered a number of alternatives that are likely to be a springboard for reform, most notably the “Better Way” plan proposed by House Speaker Paul Ryan.  In fact, according to the Speaker’s office, “in the 114th Congress alone, House Republicans have introduced more than 400 individual bills that would improve our nation’s health care system” – demonstrating that Congress is not reticent about legislating on health care issues.  The new Senate’s Republican majority will not have the 60 votes required to override a potential Democratic filibuster of legislation to fully repeal the law. While Congress could use budget reconciliation authority (which requires only 50 votes in the Senate) to make significant changes, the drawn-out pace of the budget process may not satisfy those who want quick action in this area.  Regardless of the legislative vehicle, after years of calling for Obamacare repeal while President Obama was in office, the Republican Congress will be under tremendous pressure to act quickly – even if it is a “down-payment” on reform — now that Republicans will control the presidency and the Congress.

Continue Reading Looking Ahead to a Trump Administration: Health Care and Life Sciences Industry Perspectives