CMS Addresses Denials of HHA Claims Related to Face-to-Face Documentation Issues

CMS has notified providers that it is aware that some Medicare contractors are denying payment for patients who use home health services following an acute or post-acute stay when the home health agency (HHA) uses a single form (i.e., CMS-485) for the plan of care and the certification with a single signature by the community physician who assumes oversight of the patient’s home healthcare. CMS confirms the situations in which the CMS-485 form satisfies all of the certification and plan of care content requirements and will be accepted by the Medicare contractors. Additionally, CMS has learned that some contractors are denying claims for failure of the acute or post-acute physician to identify the community physician who will assume care for the patient. CMS notes that it has not mandated a specific documentation protocol to hand-off a patient to the community physician. For claims that have been previously denied for these reasons, contractors have been instructed to reopen and determine if face-to-face requirements have been met upon request of the HHA.

CMS Adopts Home Health PPS Rate Cut for 2012

Medicare home health PPS rates will be reduced by 2.31% ($430 million) in CY 2012 under a final rule published by CMS on November 4, 2011. This rate cut reflects a 2.4% market basket update that is reduced by 1 percentage point as mandated by the ACA, a 0.03% wage index increase, and a 3.79% reduction to account for increases in aggregate case-mix that are unrelated to changes in the patient’s health status. Note that in the proposed rule, CMS anticipated that rates would be cut by 3.35% for 2012, but the agency decided to implement its case mix adjustment over two years instead of one; under the final rule, an additional -1.32% case mix reduction is scheduled for 2013. In addition, if a home health agency does not submit required quality data, the home health market basket increase will be reduced by an additional 2 percentage points. The rule also makes a number of case-mix changes, including lowering payments for high-therapy episodes and recalibrating case-mix weights. The rule also addresses a number of home health policy issues. For instance, the rule allows physicians who attend to a home health patient in an acute or post-acute setting to inform the certifying physician of their encounter to satisfy the requirement that a certifying physician (or allowed non-physician practitioner) has seen a patient prior to certifying a patient as eligible for the home health benefit. CMS also is clarifying its ‘‘confined to the home’’ definition and certain occupational therapy policies. 

Final CY 2012 Medicare Payment Rules in the Pipeline

CMS has sent several major calendar year 2012 Medicare payment rules to the White House Office of Management and Budget for final regulatory clearance. Rules under consideration include the final Medicare physician fee schedule, outpatient hospital, ambulatory surgical center, ESRD and home health prospective payment system rules for 2012. While the text of the regulations are not available at this point, we expect that they will be put on display at the Federal Register in the coming days. We will be providing summaries of the final rules in future updates. 

CMS Seeks Applicants for ACA Bundled Payment Initiative

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has launched the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative under Section 3021 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which authorizes the Secretary to test innovative delivery arrangements to reduce federal spending while preserving or enhancing the quality of care. Under the Bundled Payments Initiative, CMS seeks applicants who will strive to improve care coordination for Medicare beneficiaries who are hospitalized and when they leave the hospital. Very broadly, applicants will offer a discount to Medicare compared to usual Medicare spending; the applicant will be paid the Medicare savings beyond the discount level, but will assume risk for Medicare expenditures above an established risk threshold. CMS invites proposals with one of following four approaches to bundled payments:

  • Model 1: Retrospective payment models for the acute inpatient hospital stay only

For this model, the episode of care consist of all Part A services furnished to “included beneficiaries” during a hospital stay, including hospital diagnostic testing and all related therapeutic services furnished by an entity wholly owned/operated by the admitting hospital in the three days prior to admission and the hospital facility services furnished during the hospital stay. Awardees will offer a discount from the usual Part A hospital inpatient MS-DRG payments; the minimum discount varies by year, ranging from 0% for the first six months, gradually increasing to 2% by year three. 

  • Model 2: Retrospective bundled payment models for hospitals, physicians, and post-acute providers for an episode of care consisting of an inpatient hospital stay followed by post-acute care

All beneficiaries admitted to an awardee acute care hospital for agreed-upon MS-DRGs will be included in the episode. The episode begins with the inpatient hospital admission to a participating provider and continues for a minimum of 30 days following discharge. The episode includes all hospital services (as defined in Model 1), plus Part A and Part B services furnished during the hospital stay, and Part A and Part B services furnished in the post-discharge period related to the episode “anchor.” In addition to the inpatient services, bundled services include inpatient hospital readmission services; long term care hospital services (LTCH); inpatient rehabilitation facility services (IRF); skilled nursing facility services (SNF); home health agency services (HHA); hospital outpatient services; independent outpatient therapy services; clinical laboratory services; durable medical equipment (DME); and Part B drugs. Applicants should propose a target price for the episode that includes a single rate of discount on the expected Medicare payments for all included Part A and Part B services. CMS requires minimum discount of 3% for applicants who propose a 30-89 day post-discharge episode, and a 2% minimum discount for 90 day or longer episode. Awardees may not restrict beneficiary choice of provider, including post-acute care provider, and awardees will be financially liable for care for included beneficiaries that is furnished by providers who are not participating in the model. 

  • Model 3: Retrospective bundled payment models for post-acute care where the bundle does not include the acute inpatient hospital stay

The episode anchor is the initiation of post-acute care services at a SNF, IRF, LTCH, or with an HHA within 30 days of beneficiary discharge from an acute care hospital for an agreed-upon MS-DRG. The episode will begin on the date post-acute services are initiated with an awardee and continue through a minimum of 30 days following initiation of the episode. The episode must include all related Part A and Part B services furnished during the episode period, including related readmissions (all services in Model 2 except acute inpatient services). Applicants should propose a target price for the episode that includes a single rate of discount off of the expected Medicare payments for all included services. Awardees may not restrict beneficiary choice of provider; awardees are financially responsible for care for included beneficiaries furnished by providers who are not directly participating in the model.  

  • Model 4: Prospectively-administered bundled payment models for hospitals and physicians for the acute inpatient hospital stay only

Proposals under Model 4 will build on the ongoing Medicare Acute Care Episode (ACE) demonstration for cardiac and orthopedic inpatient procedure hospitalizations, but will expand to additional geographic areas and clinical conditions. CMS notes that, unlike the ACE demonstration, the Bundled Payment Initiative will not include sharing savings with patients because such policies previously “have proven operationally challenging to administer and confusing for beneficiaries.” The episode of care is the acute inpatient admission to an awardee for agreed-upon MS-DRGs through patient discharge. The episode will include Part A hospital services (as defined in Model 1) and Part B professional services, along with specified services furnished during certain readmissions. The CMS will consider applicant proposals around risk adjustment, which must include a description of the methodology and may include plans for updating risk adjustment on a yearly basis. Applicants should propose a target price for the episode that includes a single rate of discount off of the expected Medicare Part A and Part B payments for all hospital facility and professional services furnished during the hospitalization and related readmissions for all beneficiaries with the agreed-upon MS-DRGs (a minimum 3% discount). CMS and the awardee will agree to the price for the bundle of services in advance, and the awardee bears full risk for the price of the episode.

Additional requirements for each model are set forth in the request for application (RFA). In general, CMS seeks to ensure that total Medicare expenditures under any model will decrease relative to what they would have been absent this initiative, and that quality measures are met.   Gainsharing arrangements are permitted under each model, but they must meet criteria “designed to ensure that care is not inappropriately reduced, that the quality of care remains constant or is improved, that there are not inappropriate changes in utilization or referral patterns, and to guard against fraud, waste, and abuse.” CMS states in the RFA that it will consider using its waiver authority with respect to fraud and abuse laws and other Medicare provisions for such gainsharing arrangements as appropriate. Bundled payment agreements will include a performance period of 3 years, with the possibility of a 2-year extension, beginning with program start date (which may be as early as the first quarter of CY 2012 for Model 1 awardees). Potential applicants must submit a letter of intent by September 22, 2011 for Model 1 (subsequently extended until October 6) and by November 4, 2011 for Models 2, 3, and 4; additional deadlines are set forth in the RFA materials. CMS also published a Federal Register notice announcing the initiative. 

CMS Proposes Home Health PPS Rate Cut for 2012

CMS published a proposed rule on July 12, 2011 that would decrease Medicare home health agency (HHA) PPS payments for CY 2012 by 3.35%, or $640 million, compared to 2011 levels. This reimbursement cut would reflect a 2.5% market basket update that is reduced by 1 percentage point as mandated by the ACA, a 0.1% wage index increase, and a 5.06% reduction to account for increases in aggregate case-mix that are unrelated to changes in the patient’s health status. In addition, if an HHA does not submit required quality data, the home health market basket percentage increase would be reduced by an additional 2 percentage points. The rule also would make a number of case-mix changes, including removing two hypertension codes from the case-mix system, lowering payments for high-therapy episodes, and recalibrating case-mix weights. The rule also addresses a number of home health policy issues. For instance, the rule would allow physicians who attend to a home health patient in an acute or post-acute setting to inform the certifying physician of their encounters with the patient in order to satisfy the requirement that a certifying physician or an allowed non-physician practitioner (NPP) has see a patient prior to certifying a patient as eligible for the home health benefit. CMS also proposes to clarify its ‘‘confined to the home’’ definition and certain occupational therapy policies. Comments on the proposed rule will be accepted until September 6, 2011. 

Face-To-Face Encounter Requirement for Medicaid Home Health/DME

On July 12, 2011, CMS published a proposed rule that would implement an Affordable Care Act (ACA) requirement that physicians document the existence of a face-to-face encounter (including through the use of telehealth) with a Medicaid eligible individual within certain timeframes as a condition of Medicaid coverage of home health services. Likewise, Medicaid programs would be required to adopt face-to-face encounter requirements for the provision of supplies, equipment and appliances that parallel Medicare requirements pertaining to documentation of face-to-face encounters for DME. That is, CMS would only require that, for items of DME specified by CMS under the Medicare program as subject to a face-to-face encounter requirement, the physician must document that a face-to-face encounter that is related to the primary reason the individual requires the item has occurred no more than 90 days before the order is written or within 30 days after the order is written. CMS intends to issue additional guidance to states on this provision. The proposed rule also would clarify that states may not limit home health services to services delivered in the home; that is, a beneficiary is not prohibited from receiving home health services in any non-institutional setting in which normal life activities take place. Finally, the rule would clarify the definition of medical supplies, equipment, and appliances for Medicaid purposes to better align with the Medicare program’s definition. Comments will be accepted until September 12, 2011. 

OIG Report on Physician Therapy Services Provided Under the Home Health PPS

The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a report entitled "Review of Physician Therapy Services Provided During Home Health Episodes in Calendar Year 2008." The OIG notes CMS includes in the home health prospective payment system (HH PPS) base rate physician-provided therapy services that are not subject to the consolidated billing requirement and are billable by physicians. As a result, when a physician bills Medicare Part B for therapy provided to a beneficiary during a home health episode, Medicare pays twice for the same service (once to the physician under Part B and again to the home health agency under the HH PPS).   The OIG recommends that CMS eliminate any duplicate payments when rebasing home health payments by adjusting the HH PPS rate to exclude physician-provided therapy services or by making physician therapy services subject to the consolidated billing requirement. CMS agreed and provided information on action that it planned to take to address the recommendation.

Home Health/Hospice Face-to-Face Encounter Requirement

CMS is reminding home health agencies and hospices that, effective April 1, 2011, it will enforce new ACA face-to-face encounter requirements for purposes of certification of a patient’s eligibility for Medicare home health services and of recertification for Medicare hospice services.

MedPAC Report to Congress on 2012 Payment Recommendations

On March 15, 2011, MedPAC released its annual report to Congress on Medicare Payment Policy. The report includes MedPAC’s recommendations on payment rate updates and other policies, such as distribution of payments and program integrity, for Medicare fee-for-service payment systems. It also includes an overview of the status of the Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug programs. Major recommendations include the following: 

  • Congress should increase acute care hospital inpatient and HOPPS payment rates by 1% in 2012, and require the HHS Secretary to adjust inpatient payment rates in future years to fully recover all overpayments due to documentation and coding improvements.
  • Congress should provide a 1% update to Medicare physician payments and outpatient dialysis services for 2012.
  • Ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payments should increase by 0.5% for 2012, and ASCs should submit cost and quality data.
  • Congress should: eliminate the update to payment rates for skilled nursing facility (SNF) services for FY 2012; revise payment for nontherapy ancillary services; establish a quality incentive payment program for SNFs; and strengthen SNF reporting requirements.
  • Congress should: eliminate the home health update for 2012 and direct the Secretary to: begin a two-year rebasing of home health rates in 2013 (and protect beneficiaries from lower quality of care in response to rebasing); revise the case-mix system; establish a per episode copay for home health episodes not preceded by hospitalization or post-acute care use; and expand certain program integrity efforts.
  • Congress should eliminate the update for inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term care hospitals for 2012.
  • Congress should increase hospice rates by 1% for FY 2012 and adopt a series of recommendations from March 2009 addressing payment and program integrity reforms.

CBO Presents Budget Options, Including Potential Health Policy Savings

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has issued a report entitled "Reducing the Deficit: Spending and Revenue Options," a compendium of budget options to reduce the federal deficit. Many of the proposals would impact the Medicare and Medicaid programs and health insurance provided under the ACA. Highlights of the options include: adding a “public plan” to the ACA health insurance exchanges; repealing the individual health insurance mandate; limiting medical malpractice torts; converting the federal share of Medicaid’s payments for long-term care services into a block grant; reducing the floor on federal Medicaid matching rates; expanding cost-sharing for beneficiaries receiving SNF and home health services; reducing Medicare rates across the board in high-spending areas; eliminating the Medicare critical access hospital, Medicare-dependent hospital, and sole community hospital programs; and requiring manufacturers to pay a minimum rebate on Medicare Part D drugs for low-income beneficiaries. For each option, the CBO presents the potential fiscal impact and policy ramifications. 

CMS Forum on Home Health Payment Revisions to Account for Underserved/High-Severity Patients (March 31)

On March 31, 2011, CMS is hosting a special open door forum on its “Study and Report on the Development of Home Health Payment Revisions to Ensure Access to Care, and Payment for Severity of Illness.” The forum is designed to assist CMS in an initiative mandated by the Affordable Care Act to assess home health agency costs associated with providing ongoing access to care for low-income beneficiaries, those in medically underserved areas, and those with varying levels of severity of illness. The HHS Secretary must provide recommendations to Congress on legislative and administrative actions in response to the study by March 1, 2014. To that end, CMS is seeking input on the public’s first-hand experience with serving hard to reach populations and challenges certain beneficiaries may experience in accessing Medicare home health services. CMS has posted the presentation slides and a related literature review on its web site.

CMS Proposes Medicaid Community First Choice Option Under ACA

On February 25, 2011, CMS published a proposed rule that would implement an Affordable Care Act (ACA) provision to allow states to provide Medicaid home and community-based attendant services and supports through the Community First Choice (CFC) state plan option. According to CMS, the goal of the program is “to give States additional resources to make community living a first choice, and leave nursing homes and institutions as a fall back option.” The CFC program, which will be available October 1, 2011, will allow states to receive a 6 percentage point increase in federal matching payments for CFC services under “person-centered plans” that allow the individual to determine how services (such as assistance with activities of daily living and health-related tasks) are provided to promote independence. States also may cover costs for moving individuals from an institution to the community (e.g., security deposits, purchase of household supplies). Comments will be accepted until April 26, 2011.

Revised Home Health Agency (HHA) Survey Protocols

CMS has released revisions to the HHA survey protocols, including new guidance to HHA surveyors. According to CMS, the revised survey process incorporated in the protocols is “data-driven, patient outcome-oriented and less structure and process oriented.” This guidance is effective May 1, 2011. 

CMS Forum on Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (Feb. 24, 2011)

On February 24, 2011, CMS is hosting a Special Open Door Forum on “Designing A Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Program.” The event is designed to solicit input from interested parties regarding the development of the plan for implementing a value-based purchasing program for home health agencies as mandated by the Affordable Care Act.

MedPAC to Examine Medicare Provider Payment Adequacy (Jan. 13-14)

On January 13 and 14, 2011, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) is meeting to discuss Medicare payment adequacy for a number of Medicare providers, including: physicians and other health professionals, ambulatory surgical centers, hospital inpatient and outpatient services, outpatient dialysis providers, home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long term care hospitals, and hospice providers. The meeting will also address Medicare Advantage program quality. MedPAC’s assessments will be presented to Congress later this year; while the panel’s recommendations are not binding, they often help shape federal policy.

Correction of 2011 Home Health PPS Rule

CMS has published a notice correcting a technical error in its November 17, 2010 final rule updating home health prospective payment system rates for calendar year 2011. Specifically, the notice corrects errors in the calculation of the nonroutine medical supplies payment amounts for services provided in rural areas, effective January 1, 2011. 

Delayed Enforcement of Face-to-Face Encounter Requirement for Home Health & Hospice Eligibility Certifications

CMS has announced a delay in enforcement of ACA requirements that a physician have a face-to-face encounter with a patient for purposes of certifying eligibility for Medicare home health services or recertifying hospice eligibility. These requirements were scheduled to apply to home health patients with starts of care on or after January 1, 2011 and hospice recertifications on or after January 1, 2011. Given the agency’s concern that some home health agencies, physicians, and hospices may need additional time to establish operational protocols necessary to comply with this new law, however, CMS states that it expects appropriate documentation of these encounters beginning with the second quarter of 2011.

MedPAC Meeting on Medicare Payment Adequacy (Dec. 2-3)

On December 2-3, 2010, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) is meeting to discuss the adequacy of Medicare payment for a variety of services, including hospital (inpatient and outpatient), physician, ambulatory surgical center, outpatient dialysis, hospice, skilled nursing facility, home health, inpatient rehabilitation facility, and long-term care hospital services

Medicare 2011 Home Health PPS Final Rule, Including Home Health/Hospice Certification Provisions

On November 17, 2010, CMS is publishing a final rule updating Medicare home health PPS rates for 2011.  CMS estimates that the combined policies of the rule will decrease Medicare payments to home health agencies (HHAs) by $960 million (4.89%) for CY 2011. This reimbursement rate reflects implementation of an ACA provision decreasing the 2011 home health market basket update by 1 percentage point. This results in a 1.1% update for 2011 for HHAs that submit the required quality data; if an HHA does not submit quality data, the market basket increase would be reduced by 2 percentage points to -0.9%. Rates are further impacted by an updated wage index, which is offset by outlier spending reductions mandated by the ACA, along with CMS’s adoption of its proposal to decrease home health PPS rates by 3.79% in 2011 to account for additional growth in aggregate case-mix that is unrelated to changes in patients’ health status (although in response to comments, CMS is not adopting an additional 3.79% case-mix adjustment in 2012 to allow for further analysis). In addition to updating rates, the rule also implements an ACA provision under which, prior to initial certification of a patient’s eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, the physician must document that the physician or a non-physician practitioner has had a face-to-face encounter with the patient. In response to public comments, CMS has modified the proposed timeframes for the face-to-face encounters and removed proposed requirements concerning the physician’s own medical record documentation, among other refinements. With regard to hospice services, the rule also requires a hospice physician or nurse practitioner to provide a face-to-face encounter prior to the hospice physician re-certifying the patient’s eligibility for hospice services at the 180th day recertification of care and for all subsequent certifications (CMS adopted a series of clarifications and refinements to this proposal in the final rule). The final rule also: adopts exemptions and other clarifications to CMS’s policy requiring HHAs that change ownership within three years of initial enrollment to obtain a new state survey or accreditation; revises requirements for coverage of therapy services in the home health setting (including requirements that qualified therapists perform services and measure and document therapy effectiveness); and updates quality reporting requirements for the 2012 home health PPS rate update.

MedPAC Policy Meeting

On September 13 and 14, 2010, MedPAC met to discuss a variety of Medicare policy issues, including the following: the context for Medicare payment policy; Medicare’s shared savings program for accountable care organizations (ACOs); recent changes that affect Medicare beneficiaries’ financial liability; retainer-based physician practice; Medicare’s authority to apply least-costly alternative policies; growth in hospital observation care; the growth of ancillary services in physicians’ offices; and accountability for DME, home health, and hospice services.

CMS Finalizes New DMEPOS Supplier Standards

On August 27, 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a final rule that clarifies and expands the requirements that suppliers of durable medical equipment and prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) must meet to establish and maintain Medicare billing privileges. Among other things, the rule prohibits suppliers from sharing a practice location with any other Medicare supplier or provider, unless the practice location is: (1) where certain physicians or nonphysician practitioners furnish items to their own patients as part of their professional service; (2) where a physical or occupational therapists furnishes items to their own patients as part of their professional service; or (3) where a hospital, home health agency, skilled nursing facility, or other Part A provider that is enrolled in Medicare co-locates with a DMEPOS supplier that meets all other supplier standards and that is owned by that Part A provider and is a separate unit. The rule also imposes new physical facility requirements on suppliers, including square footage, accessibility, signage, and storage requirements (these rules also apply to “closed door” businesses such as a pharmacy or supplier providing services only to beneficiaries residing in a nursing home). Among other things, the rule also:

• Clarifies the prohibition on the direct solicitation of Medicare beneficiaries.
• Defines adverse final action and allows CMS to reopen all Medicare claims paid on or after the date of a final adverse action in order to establish an overpayment determination.
• Prohibits suppliers from contracting with another individual to perform licensed services, with certain exceptions.
• Requires the use of a primary business telephone, and prohibits the use of cellular phones, beepers, pagers, or answering machines/answering services as the primary business telephone.
• Mandates that suppliers obtain oxygen from a state-licensed oxygen supplier (as applicable in the state).
• Requires suppliers to maintain ordering and referring documentation consistent with regulations.
• Establishes minimum hours of operation (with certain exceptions).
• Permits CMS to revoke a supplier's billing privileges if it is found not to meet certain supplier standards.

The effective date is September 27, 2010 (although there are separate deadlines for compliance with the physical facility standards for existing suppliers with leases that expire after that date).

DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Educational Articles

The Medicare DMEPOS competitive bidding program is scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2011 in nine competitive bidding areas (CBAs). Under this program, only suppliers who are winning bidders and enter into a contract with CMS will be eligible to furnish certain categories of DMEPOS to Medicare beneficiaries in the CBAs (with very limited exceptions), and they will be paid based on the median of the winning suppliers’ bids for each of the selected items in the region. CMS has issued a variety of educational articles to help suppliers, referral agents, and beneficiaries prepare for the program. Recent articles address how the competitive bidding program will impact home health agencies and suppliers of oxygen equipment. Reed Smith’s previous reports and analyses regarding the program are posted here.

Medicare 2011 Home Health PPS Proposed Rule with Home Health/Hospice Certification Provisions

On July 23, 2010, CMS published a proposed rule updating Medicare home health PPS rates for 2011. CMS estimates that the combined policies of the rule would decrease Medicare payments to home health agencies (HHAs) by $900 million (4.75%) for calendar year (CY) 2011. Among other things, the rule would implement an Affordable Care Act (ACA) provision decreasing the CY 2011 home health market basket update by 1 percentage point. This results in a proposed 1.4% update for CY 2011 for HHAs that submit the required quality data; if an HHA does not submit quality data, the market basket increase would be reduced by 2 percentage points to -0.6%. CMS also proposes to decrease home health PPS rates by 3.79% in CY 2011 (and an additional 3.79% in 2012) to account for additional growth in aggregate case-mix that is unrelated to changes in patients’ health status, along with further reduction in rates under an ACA outlier policy. In addition to updating rates, the proposed rule would implement an ACA provision under which, prior to certifying a patient’s eligibility for the Medicare home health or hospice benefit, the physician must document that the physician or a non-physician practitioner has had a face-to-face encounter with the patient. CMS also proposes exemptions and other clarifications to its policy requiring HHAs that change ownership within three years of initial enrollment to obtain a new state survey or accreditation, along with changes impacting the coverage of therapy services in the home health setting. CMS is accepting comments on the proposed rule until September 14, 2010.

GAO Report on Home Infusion Therapy

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report on “Home Infusion Therapy: Differences between Medicare and Private Insurers' Coverage.” The report describes (1) coverage of home infusion therapy components under Medicare fee-for-service, (2) coverage and payment for home infusion therapy by other health insurers, and (3) the utilization and quality management practices that health insurers use with home infusion therapy benefits. Noting that the extent of Medicare coverage of infusion services varies by the beneficiary’s condition and treatment needs, the GAO recommends that the HHS Secretary conduct a study of home infusion therapy to inform Congress regarding the potential program costs, savings, and other issues associated with a comprehensive Medicare benefit.

Medicare/Medicaid Provider and Supplier Enrollment, Ordering and Referring, and Documentation Requirements, and Changes in Provider Agreements

This post was written by Paul W. Pitts.

CMS published an interim final rule with comment period on May 5, 2010 implementing several enrollment and documentation changes to the Medicare and Medicaid programs as mandated by the PPACA. The rule is effective on July 6, 2010 and comments will be accepted through the effective date. In the final rule, CMS requires providers and suppliers to include their NPI on all Medicare enrollment applications, as well as all claims submitted to the Medicare and Medicaid programs. In addition, Part B services must be ordered or referred by a physician or, when permitted, another eligible professional. The final rule also requires physicians and other eligible professionals who order or refer Part B services for Medicare beneficiaries to be enrolled in the Medicare program or maintain a valid opt-out record. With respect to home health services, the services must be ordered by a physician (not an “eligible professional”). All claims submitted for Part B items or services must contain the legal name and NPI of the physician or eligible professional who ordered or referred the item or service. In addition, the rule requires both the furnishing and ordering provider or supplier of DMEPOS, home health, laboratory, imaging, or specialist services to maintain documentation of the order or referral for 7 years, including the NPI of the ordering or referring physician or eligible professional. The documentation of the order or referral must be supplied to CMS or the Medicare contractor upon request. Failure to comply with the documentation requirements may result in a 1 year revocation of enrollment and billing privileges in the Medicare program. Although much of the final rule was mandated by various sections of the PPACA, CMS is using its discretion to expand ordering and referring requirements to all Part B items and services except prescribed drugs. In the preamble to the final rule, CMS indicates that it “reserves the right” to apply these enrollment and ordering requirements to Part B drugs within the next year. 

CMS Rescinds Transmittal on HHA 36-Month Rule

On May 5, 2010, CMS announced it is rescinding a controversial transmittal issued on December 18, 2009 (Transmittal 318) that would have revised the Medicare Program Integrity Manual to implement the so-called home health agency (HHA) 36-month rule established in 42 C.F.R. § 424.550(b). This rule, adopted as part of the HHA PPS rule for 2010, states that if the owner of an HHA sells (including asset sales or stock transfers), transfers, or relinquishes ownership of the HHA within 36 months after the effective date of the HHA’s enrollment in Medicare, the provider agreement and Medicare billing privileges do not convey to the new owner. Transmittal 318 adopted an expansive interpretation of the circumstances under which a HHA would be required to seek initial certification and enrollment in Medicare. In its notice rescinding Transmittal 318, CMS indicated that Transmittal 318 would not be replaced at this time. 

HHS/CMS PPACA Implementation Announcements

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has issued a letter to governors and independent insurance commissioners to gauge interest in the temporary high risk pool program established by the PPACA to provide coverage to people who are uninsured because of pre-existing conditions. CMS also has issued initial guidance to states on the new state option under the PPACA to provide Medicaid coverage for the lowest income adults without regard to disability, parental status, or most other categorical limitations. Likewise, CMS has issued a number of informal announcements about implementation of various PPACA provisions, including announcements addressing:

  • The Extension of Ambulance Add-Ons for Ambulance Services
  • Timely Filing Requirements for Medicare Fee-for-Service Claims
  • Medicare Home Health Rural Add-On
  • Extension of Moratorium that Allows Independent Laboratories to Bill for the Technical Component of Physician Pathology Services Furnished to Hospital Patients
  • Extension of Therapy Cap Exceptions Process
  • Continuation of Payments to Indian Health Service Providers, Suppliers, Physicians, and other Practitioners for Certain Part B Services
  • Extension of the Outpatient Hold-Harmless Provision
  • Extension of Reasonable Cost Payment for Clinical Lab Tests Performed by Hospitals with Fewer than 50 Beds in Qualified Rural Areas

CMS Announces Series of "RAC 101" Calls

CMS is hosting a series of “Nationwide RAC 101 Calls” to educate providers on the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program.  The following calls are scheduled:  an April 28, 2010 general call; a May 4 call for home health and hospice providers; a May 5 call for DMEPOS suppliers; and a May 12 call for physicians. 

MedPAC Issues 2011 Medicare Payment Recommendations

On March 1, 2010, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) issued its recommendations to Congress regarding Medicare provider payment updates for 2011. Among other things, MedPAC recommends: 

  • Increasing acute inpatient and outpatient prospective payment system reimbursement in 2011 by the projected rate of increase in the hospital market basket index (MBI), coupled with implementation of a quality incentive payment program. MedPAC also proposes an offset of up to 2 percentage points in 2011 through 2013 to recover payments attributable to hospital documentation and coding changes.
  • Increasing payments for physician services in 2011 by 1.0%, and establishing a budget-neutral payment adjustment for primary care services billed under the physician fee schedule and furnished by primary-care-focused practitioners.
  • Increasing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) rates by 0.6% and requiring ASCs to submit cost and quality data.
  • Updating the end stage renal disease (ESRD) composite rate by the ESRD MBI increase minus a productivity growth adjustment (a net updated of approximately 0.7%).
  • Updating hospice rates by the projected MBI for 2011, minus an adjustment for productivity gains (a net update of approximately 1.1%). MedPAC also reiterated a series of hospice recommendation from March 2009 addressing broader payment and policy reforms.
  • Eliminating the 2011 payment update for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and adopting previous recommendations for reforms to SNF payments, including proposals to better account for nontherapy ancillary costs, update quality measures, and promote SNF reporting of more accurate diagnostic and service-use information. 
  • Providing no inflation update for home health services in 2011, rebasing home health rates with provisions to protect quality of care, developing quality outcomes measures, and implementing certain program integrity safeguards.
  • Eliminating the payment update in 2011 for inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term care hospitals.

The MedPAC report also reviews the status of MA plans and Part D prescription drug plans, and it provides recommendations on comparing quality among MA plans and between MA and fee-for-service providers. Note that while MedPAC’s recommendations are not binding, policymakers often consider MedPAC’s assessments when updating Medicare payment policies.  

MedPAC Votes on 2011 Medicare Provider Update Recommendations

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) recently voted on recommendations it will make to Congress regarding Medicare payment updates for 2011. At the meeting, MedPAC voted to recommend increasing acute inpatient and outpatient prospective payment system reimbursement in 2011 by the projected rate of increase in the hospital market basket index (MBI). This rate increase would be coupled with implementation of a quality incentive payment program, along with an offset in 2011 through 2013 to recover payments attributable to hospital documentation and coding improvements. MedPAC also recommends that Congress increase payments for physician services in 2011 by 1.0%. For ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), MedPAC recommends a 0.6% increase in rates, together with a requirement that ASCs to submit cost and quality data. MedPAC recommends updating the end stage renal disease (ESRD) composite rate by the ESRD MBI increase minus a productivity growth adjustment. MedPAC approved a series of recommendations regarding home health services, including elimination of the inflation update for 2011, rebasing of home health rates with provisions to protect quality of care, development of quality outcomes measures, and implementation of certain program integrity safeguards. With regard to other post-acute services, MedPAC recommends no payment update in 2011 for skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, or long-term care hospitals. MedPAC also recommends updating hospice rates by the projected MBI for 2011, minus an adjustment for productivity gains. These recommendations will be included in MedPAC's March 2010 report to Congress. While the recommendations are not binding, MedPAC’s assessments often help shape federal policy. 

New Medicare Home Health Outlier Policy Guidance Issued

The final 2010 Medicare home health prospective payment system (HH PPS) rule established an annual limitation on Medicare outlier payments that can be paid to each home health agency (HHA). Specifically, effective January 1, 2010, outlier payments may comprise no more than 10% of the HHA’s total HH PPS payments for the year. CMS has issued instructions to contractors and a provider educational article about how the new policy is being implemented, including the use of a quarterly reconciliation process. 

Aberrant Medicare Home Health Outlier Payment Patterns

According to a recent HHS Office of Inspector (OIG) report, "Aberrant Medicare Home Health Outlier Payment Patterns in Miami-Dade County and Other Geographic Areas in 2008," Miami-Dade County, Florida, was responsible for more Medicare home health outlier payments in 2008 than the rest of the country combined. Another 23 counties nationwide also exhibiting "aberrant" home health payment patterns, the OIG found. Among other things, the OIG reports that more than 85% of home health providers that received outlier payments of over $100,000 per beneficiary were located in Miami-Dade County, and outlier payments for claims with a primary diagnosis related to diabetes were eight times the national average in this area. The OIG recommend that CMS: (1) continue its efforts to cap individual home health provider annual outlier payments; (2) review and respond to providers with aberrant outlier payment patterns, and (3) continue with efforts to strengthen enrollment standards for home health providers. CMS concurred with the recommendations and noted it was taking regulatory steps to limit home health outlier payments.

HH PPS Outlier Policy Guidance

CMS has provided clarifying information regarding the new Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) outlier policy, which was established in the final Medicare HH PPS update for 2010. 

CMS OASIS-C Educational Call (Dec. 8).

On December 8, 2009, CMS is hosting another provider conference call to provide tips for preparing for the transition to the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS-C), an updated version of the data set that home health agencies must collect in order to participate in Medicare. Registration closes on December 7.

Final CY 2010 Medicare Home Health PPS Rule

Under CMS’s CY 2010 Medicare home health PPS (HH PPS) final rule, published November 10, 2009, Medicare home health spending is expected to be reduced by $140 million (1.03%) in 2010 compared to 2009 levels. The reimbursement reduction reflects a 2.0% home health MBI increase ($350 million), offset by the effects of an updated wage index (-$10 million), and a 2.75% decrease resulting from the third year of a 4-year phase-in of adjustments to rates to account for case-mix changes (-$480 million). Note that the home health MBI update is reduced by 2 percentage points (to 0.0%) for CY 2010 for those HHAs that do not submit required quality data. CMS also has adopted provisions designed to “mitigate possible billing vulnerabilities associated with excessive outlier payments.” Specifically, for 2010 CMS will cap per-agency outlier payments at 10%, and reduce the target for total aggregate outlier payments to 2.5% of total HH PPS payments (compared to the current 5% target), with a corresponding 2.5% increase in HH PPS rates. The rule also, among other things: requires the submission of Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data as a condition for payment under the HH PPS; clarifies coverage of skilled services and routine medical supplies; updates conditions of participation; implements use of OASIS Version C beginning January 1, 2010; updates quality reporting measures; and implements a Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Home Health Care Survey beginning in 2012. The final rule also includes various payment safeguards for HHAs, but with a number of modifications from the proposed rule. Notably, CMS did not adopt a provision in its proposed rule that would have prohibited an HHA from sharing its practice location or base of operations with another Medicare-enrolled HHA or supplier, citing its determination that a broad-based prohibition on co-location policy could “negativity impact the health care delivery for some services.” CMS expressed its continuing concerns about these arrangements, however, particularly when an HHA that maintains a practice location in one state and furnishes services to beneficiaries in another state, or when HHAs have merged or consolidated operations into a single practice location, but continue to operate as distinct entities. CMS will consider its administrative remedies to address its concerns in this area.

CMS OASIS-C Educational Call (Nov. 12)

On November 12, 2009, CMS is hosting another provider conference call on the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS-C), an updated version of the data set that home health agencies must collect in order to participate in Medicare. Registration is required by November 11.

OASIS-C Provider Call (Oct. 22, 2009)

On October 22, 2009, CMS Is hosting a national provider call on the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS-C). OASIS-C is the first major update to the data set that home health agencies must collect in order to participate in Medicare. Changes to the OASIS include significant revisions to existing items and the addition of items that measure the processes of care. Transition to OASIS-C is scheduled to occur January 1, 2010. Registration is required by October 21.
 

CMS Corrects Physician Fee Schedule, Inpatient Psychiatric Facility PPS, and Home Health PPS Rules

On August 5, 2009, CMS published a correction to its July 13, 2009 proposed rule on Medicare physician fee schedule payments and policies for calendar year (CY) 2010. The notice makes technical questions and adds quality reporting measures regarding Functional Communications. CMS also has published a notice correcting typographical errors that appeared in its May 1, 2009 notice on Medicare inpatient psychiatric facilities prospective payment system (PPS) rates effective July 1, 2009. In addition, on August 13, 2009, CMS republished its August 6, 2009 Medicare home health PPS proposed rule for CY 2010 to correct data in the tables.

CY 2010 Home Health PPS Proposed Rule

CMS’s proposed rule updating the Medicare home health PPS (HH PPS) would reduce Medicare home health spending by $100 million compared to CY 2009. The reimbursement cut reflects a 2.2% home health MBI increase ($390 million), offset by the distributional effects of an updated wage index (-$10 million), and a 2.75% decrease resulting from the third year of a 4-year phase-in of adjustments to rates to account for case-mix changes (-$480 million) and other policy changes. Note that the home health MBI update would be reduced by 2 percentage points to 0.2% for CY 2010 for those HHAs that do not submit required quality data. CMS also proposes changes to the outlier payment policy that seek to respond to “overwhelming evidence showing a small, but growing number of home health providers have been abusing the system, especially in certain parts of the country.” Specifically, CMS proposes a 10% per agency cap on outlier payments and a reduction in the target for total aggregate outlier payments (2.5% of total HH PPS payments, compared to the current 5% target), with a corresponding 2.5% increase in HH PPS rates. The rule also would: require the submission of Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data as a condition for payment under the HH PPS; make payment and enrollment “safeguards”; clarify coverage of skilled services and routine medical supplies; and update condition of participation. CMS also is soliciting comments on: physician/patient interaction regarding the home health plan of care; expansion of quality reporting to include the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Home Health Care Survey; use of OASIS Version C beginning in 2010; and proposed pay-for-reporting measures for use in CY 2011. Comments on the proposed rule will be accepted until September 28, 2009. The official version of the rule will be published in the Federal Register on August 6, 2009.

Update:  CMS published guidance in December 2009 on Medicare's new home health outlier policy.

 

White House proposes $313 billion in additional Medicare/Medicaid cuts

The White House has proposed $313 billion in new Medicare and Medicaid cuts over 10 years, in addition to the provisions included in the Administration's proposed FY 2010 budget. Among other things, the Administration is endorsing: incorporating productivity adjustments into Medicare payment updates; reducing hospital subsidies for treating the uninsured as coverage increases; paying "better" prices for Medicare Part D drugs (including reducing reimbursement for beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid); increasing the equipment utilization factor for advanced imaging from 50 percent to 95 percent; adopting MedPAC’s recommendations for 2010 payments to skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term care hospitals; and cutting waste, fraud, and abuse (including prepayment review for physicians in high-risk areas or those that order a high volume of high-risk services such as durable medical equipment, home health, and home infusion services).

The following chart summarizes the Obama Administration's health reform financing proposals released to date:

 
 
Source
Health Care Reserve Fund
($ in billions)
10 years
FY 2010 Budget
-  Medicare and Medicaid Savings
-  Revenues
$635
$309
$326
Additional Medicare and Medicaid Savings
-  Incorporate productivity adjustments into Medicare payment 
    updates
-  Reduce hospital subsidies for treating the uninsured as  
    coverage increases
-  Pay better prices for Medicare Part D drugs

-  Other

$313
$110

 
$106

 
$75
$22
Total
$948

Senate Finance Releases Health Reform Financing Options -- Comments Due May 26, 2009

Today Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and Ranking Member Chuck Grassley released a policy paper setting forth options for financing health reform. This is the third and final set of policy options for discussion before the Finance Committee marks up legislation in June. The Finance Committee has scheduled a member "walk through" to discuss the financing policy options on May 20, 2009. The financing options include, among other things: adjusting annual market basket updates and imposing “productivity adjustments” for various Medicare fee-for-service providers; a variety of payment changes impacting hospitals and home health agencies; Part B payment reforms (targeting potentially-overvalued Part B services and utilization of advanced diagnostic imaging services); improvements to promote payment accuracy for durable medical equipment; a variety of reforms pertaining to Medicaid drug rebates; policy options to reduce inappropriate spending variations across and within geographic areas; revisions to beneficiary cost-sharing obligations, including Part D means testing; and a variety of tax code changes involving the exclusion for employer-provided health coverage, changes to the itemized deduction for medical expenses, and excise tax provisions affecting alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverages.  The Finance Committee will accept comments on the health reform financing options through May 26, 2009.

Finance Committee Releases Health Care Delivery System Reform Options; Comment Opportunity (Due May 15)

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and Ranking Member Chuck Grassley released a lengthy policy paper on April 28, 2009 discussing options for reducing health care costs and improving quality in the health care delivery system, including significant Medicare payment reform proposals. Key areas addressed in the paper include the following:  

  • Promoting Quality Care – Policy options to promote quality in the Medicare program include: establishing value‐based purchasing programs for hospitals, home health, and SNFs by FY 2012; expanding programs leading to value‐based purchasing for doctors, IRFs, and LTCHs; tying Medicare Advantage payments to quality of care; and restricting utilization of diagnostic imaging services.
  • Fostering Care Coordination and Provider Collaboration – Policy options to enhance care management efforts include: establishing Medicare payment incentives for hospitals that reduce preventable hospital readmissions; providing a single bundled Medicare payment for acute and post‐acute episodes of care; establishing Medicare pilot programs of patient‐centered care coordination models for the chronically ill ; making reforms to Medicare physician reimbursement rates.
  • Infrastructure Investments – Potential health delivery infrastructure investments include:  additional efforts to support widespread adoption and meaningful use of health information technology (beyond ARRA provisions); the development of quality measures; the establishment of a independent institute to conduct comparative effectiveness research; and improvements to health care workforce training.
  • Transparency– Policy options to promote transparency include: requiring drug and device manufacturers to report publicly certain payments to physicians; establishing new restrictions on specialty hospitals; and expanding information for consumers on nursing home quality. 
  • Other Health Care Delivery Options – Among other things, the plan calls for various steps to promote primary care (including providing primary care practitioners and targeted general surgeons with a 5% Medicare payment bonus) and expanded efforts to fight Medicare fraud and abuse.

The the deadline for public comments is May 15, 2009. The document is the first of three sets of potential option papers, each covering a different topic area that members will discuss before a bipartisan “Chairman’s Mark” on comprehensive health care reform is developed. Policy option papers on increasing health care coverage and financing health care reform will be released following future roundtable discussions on those topics. Note that the Finance Committee held its roundtable discussion on access to health care coverage on May 5, 2009, so an options paper on that topic should be available in the near future. In addition, on May 12, the Senate Finance Committee is holding its third roundtable discussion, this one focusing on financing comprehensive health care reform.

GAO Report on Home Health Payments

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released a report entitled “Medicare: Improvements Needed to Address Improper Payments in Home Health.” The report examines the growth in Medicare home health spending and utilization linked to upcoding and other fraudulent practices, concentrating on a review of home health agencies (HHAs) in California, Florida, Louisiana, Nevada, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah. The GAO recommends that CMS: consider verifying the criminal history of key officials named on an HHA enrollment application; provide additional information to physicians who's identification number was used to certify HHA plans of care; direct CMS contractors to conduct postpayment medical reviews on claims submitted by HHAs with high rates of improper billing identified through prepayment review; and issue rules to expand the types of improper billing practices that are grounds for revocation of billing privileges.

Obama Budget Proposal

On February 26, 2009, the Obama Administration released its proposed federal budget for fiscal year (FY) 2010. Most significantly in terms of health policy, the proposal would establish a reserve fund of $633.8 billion over 10 years to finance health reform. While half of the reserve funds would come from tax increases on higher-income individuals, the rest would come from health system savings impacting a wide range of providers, health plans, and manufacturers. While additional details are expected to be released in the coming weeks, the following are highlights of the information released to date: 

  • Medicare Advantage (MA) Payments. The budget would replace the current mechanism for establishing MA rates with a competitive system in which Medicare payments would be based upon an average of plans’ bids. The Administration estimates a savings of more than $175 billion over 10 years from this provision – approximately half of the health care savings in the budget proposal.
  • Reducing Drug PricesThe Administration proposes establishing a regulatory pathway for approval of follow-on biologicals. Additionally, brand biologic manufacturers would be prohibited from reformulating existing products into new products to restart the exclusivity process. The Administration also would prevent drug companies from blocking generic drugs from consumers by prohibiting anticompetitive agreements between brand name and generic drug manufacturers intended to keep generic drugs off the market. The budget also would increase the Medicaid drug rebate for brand-name drugs from 15.1% to 22.1% of the average manufacturer price (AMP), apply the additional rebate to new drug formulations, and allow states to collect rebates on drugs provided through Medicaid managed care organizations. The budget also supports the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) efforts to allow Americans to buy drugs from other countries.
  • Medicare and Medicaid Payment Accuracy/Program Integrity. The budget would expand CMS’s capacity to identify excessive payments and correct problems, such as through use of National Correct Coding Initiative edits for Medicaid claims. The budget also proposes to dedicate additional resources for oversight and program integrity activities related to the Medicare prescription drug program, MA, and Medicaid.
  • Hospital/Post-Acute Care Bundling, Reduced Hospital Readmission Rates. The budget calls for bundling payments to hospitals and certain post-acute providers for services provided within 30 days after discharge from the hospital. In addition, hospitals with high rates of readmission would be paid less if patients are re-admitted to the hospital within the same 30-day period.
  • Hospital Quality Improvement. The budget would link a portion of Medicare payments for acute inpatient hospital services to hospital performance on specific quality measures.
  • Physician Payment System Reforms. The Administration supports “comprehensive, but fiscally responsible” reforms to the physician fee schedule formula.
  • Cancer Research.  The budget includes over $6 billion in funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to support cancer research.

Other Medicare/Medicaid health policy line-items identified in the budget charts include the following, among others: 

  • Establishing survey and certification revisit and recertification user fees;
  • Enabling physicians to form voluntary groups that coordinate care for Medicare beneficiaries and to receive performance-based payments for coordinated care;
  • Addressing financial conflicts of interest in physician-owned specialty hospitals;
  • Requiring the use of radiology benefit managers for Medicare imaging services;
  • Aligning Medicare home health payments with costs; and
  • Imposing higher Medicare drug benefit premiums on certain higher-income beneficiaries.

Note that many provisions of the proposed budget would require Congressional approval to implement. To that end, a number of Congressional committees have scheduled hearings on the budget proposal, including a March 10 Senate Finance Committee hearing focusing on the budget’s health care provisions.

MedPAC Report to Congress -- Medicare Payment/Transparency Provisions

On February 27, 2009, MedPAC released its March 2009 Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. The report includes a series of recommendations for Medicare payments designed to assure beneficiaries’ access to care and preserve Medicare’s long-term sustainability, particularly through reductions in payment updates for 2010. The report also includes recommendations to increase transparency of physician financial relationships. A listing of key recommendations follows after the jump. 

Hospitals

  • The Congress should increase payment rates for the acute inpatient and outpatient prospective payment systems in 2010 by the projected rate of increase in the hospital market basket index, concurrent with implementation of a quality incentive payment program.
  • The Congress should reduce the indirect medical education adjustment (IME) in 2010 by 1 percentage point to 4.5 percent per 10 percent increment in the resident-to-bed ratio. The funds obtained by reducing the IME adjustment should be used to fund a quality incentive payment program.

Physicians and Ambulatory Surgical Centers

  • The Congress should update payments for physician services in 2010 by 1.1 percent.
  • The Congress should establish a budget-neutral payment adjustment for primary care services billed under the physician fee schedule and furnished by primary-care-focused practitioners. Primary-care-focused practitioners are those whose specialty designation is defined as primary care and/or those whose pattern of claims meets a minimum threshold of furnishing primary care services. The Secretary would use rulemaking to establish criteria for determining a primary-care-focused practitioner.
  • The Congress should direct the Secretary to increase the equipment use standard for expensive imaging machines from 25 to 45 hours per week. This change should redistribute RVUs from expensive imaging to other physician services.
  • The Congress should increase payments for ambulatory surgical centers (ASC) services in calendar year 2010 by 0.6 percent. In addition, the Congress should require ASCs to submit to the Secretary cost data and quality data that will allow for an effective evaluation of the adequacy of ASC payment rates.

Dialysis Services

  • The Congress should maintain current law and update the composite rate in calendar year 2010 by 1 percent.

Skilled Nursing Facility Services

  • The Congress should eliminate the update to payment rates for skilled nursing facility services for fiscal year 2010.
  • The Congress should require the Secretary to revise the skilled nursing facility (SNF) prospective payment system by: adding a separate nontherapy ancillary (NTA) component, replacing the therapy component with one that establishes payments based on predicted patient care needs, and adopting an outlier policy.
  • The Secretary should direct SNFs to report more accurate diagnostic and service-use information by requiring that: claims include detailed diagnosis information and dates of service, services furnished since admission to the SNF be recorded separately in the patient assessment, and SNFs report their nursing costs in the Medicare cost report.
  • The Congress should establish a quality incentive payment policy for SNFs in Medicare and to improve quality measurement for SNFs, the Secretary should: add the risk-adjusted rates of potentially avoidable rehospitalizations and community discharge to its publicly reported post-acute care quality measures; revise the pain, pressure ulcer, and delirium measures currently reported on CMS’s Nursing Home Compare website; and require SNFs to conduct patient assessments at admission and discharge.

Home Health Services

  • The Congress should eliminate the market basket increase for 2010 and advance the planned reductions for coding adjustments in 2011 to 2010, so that payments in 2010 are reduced by 5.5 percent from 2009 levels.
  • The Congress should direct the Secretary to re-base rates for home health care services in 2011 to reflect the average cost of providing care.
  • The Congress should direct the Secretary to assess payment measures that protect the quality of care and ensure incentives for the efficient delivery of home health care. The study should include alternative payment strategies such as blended payments and risk corridors and outcome-based quality incentives.

Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

  • The update to the payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation services should be eliminated for fiscal year 2010.

Long-Term Care Hospitals

  • The Secretary should update payment rates for long-term care hospitals for fiscal year 2010 by the projected rate of increase in the rehabilitation, psychiatric and long-term care hospital (RPL) market basket index less the Commission’s adjustment for productivity growth.

Recommendations on Medicare Advantage Payments

  • The Congress should: Eliminate the stabilization fund for regional PPOs. Remove the effect of payments for indirect medical education from the MA plan benchmarks. Set the benchmarks that CMS uses to evaluate MA plan bids at 100 percent of FFS costs. Pay-for-performance should apply in MA to reward plans that provide higher quality care. Clarify that regional plans should submit bids that are standardized for the region’s MA-eligible population.
  • The Secretary should calculate clinical measures for the FFS program that would permit CMS to compare the FFS program with MA plans.

Recommendations on Public Reporting of Physician Financial Relationships

  • The Congress should require all manufacturers and distributors of drugs, biologicals, medical devices, and medical supplies (and their subsidiaries) to report to the Secretary their financial relationships with: physicians, physician groups, and other prescribers; pharmacies and pharmacists; health plans, pharmacy benefit managers, and their employees; hospitals and medical schools; organizations that sponsor continuing medical education; patient organizations; and professional organizations.
  • The Congress should direct the Secretary to post the information submitted by manufacturers on a public website in a format that is searchable by: manufacturer; recipient’s name, location, and specialty (if applicable); type of payment; name of the related drug or device (if applicable); and year.
  • The Congress should require manufacturers and distributors of drugs to report to the Secretary the following information about drug samples: each recipient’s name and business address; the name, dosage, and number of units of each sample; and the date of distribution. The Secretary should make this information available through data use agreements.
  • The Congress should require all hospitals and other entities that bill Medicare for services to annually report the ownership share of each physician who directly or indirectly owns an interest in the entity (excluding publicly traded corporations). The Secretary should post this information on a searchable public website.
  • The Congress should require the Secretary to submit a report, based on the Disclosure of Financial Relationships Report, of the types and prevalence of financial arrangements between hospitals and physicians.

Recommendations on Reforming the Hospice Benefit

  • The Congress should direct the Secretary to change the Medicare payment system for hospice to: have relatively higher payments per day at the beginning of the episode and relatively lower payments per day as the length of the episode increases; include a relatively higher payment for the costs associated with patient death at the end of the episode; and implement the payment system changes in 2013, with a brief transitional period. These payment system changes should be implemented in a budget neutral manner in the first year.
  • The Congress should direct the Secretary to: require that a hospice physician or advanced practice nurse visit the patient to determine continued eligibility prior to the 180th-day recertification and each subsequent recertification and attest that such visits took place, require that certifications and recertifications include a brief narrative describing the clinical basis for the patient’s prognosis, and require that all stays in excess of 180 days be medically reviewed for hospices for which stays exceeding 180 days make up 40 percent or more of their total cases.
  • The Secretary should direct the Office of Inspector General to investigate: the prevalence of financial relationships between hospices and long-term care facilities such as nursing facilities and assisted living facilities that may represent a conflict of interest and influence admissions to hospice, differences in patterns of nursing home referrals to hospice, the appropriateness of enrollment practices for hospices with unusual utilization patterns (e.g., high frequency of very long stays, very short stays, or enrollment of patients discharged from other hospices), and the appropriateness of hospice marketing materials and other admissions practices and potential correlations between length of stay and deficiencies in marketing or admissions practices.
  • The Secretary should collect additional data on hospice care and improve the quality of all data collected to facilitate the management of the hospice benefit. Additional data could be collected from claims as a condition of payment and from hospice cost reports.

Clinical Laboratory Certification/Public Health Testing, HHAs, and Hospices

CMS has issued a memo to state survey agencies clarifying CMS policies regarding the certification of laboratories performing limited public health testing. The memo also clarifies the policies and procedures for the certification of entities with multiple sites, specifically for home health agencies (HHAs) and hospices.  

Medicaid and Medicare Home Health Payments

The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a report entitled Medicaid and Medicare Home Health Payments for Skilled Nursing and Home Health Aide Services.” The OIG found that Medicaid and Medicare both may be paying for the same home health services as a result of complex payment policies for services provided to dually-eligible beneficiaries and lack of clarity in the Medicare coverage policy regarding billing for unskilled and skilled nursing services. Based on a five-state review, the OIG concluded that Medicaid paid nearly $2 million for skilled nursing and home health aide services that were vulnerable to also being paid by Medicare. The OIG suggests that CMS could consider methods to better integrate Medicaid and Medicare claims processing to prevent duplicate payments. CMS also could clarify the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual to explain that unskilled services provided during a skilled nursing visit paid under the Medicare home health prospective payment system (PPS) are included in the PPS payment.

DME Supplier, HHA Enforcement Efforts

December 29, 2008, CMS announced that it has revoked the billing privileges of more than 1,100 medical equipment suppliers in south Florida and the Los Angeles area as part of its DMEPOS High-Risk Suppliers Demonstration. In addition, CMS has suspended payments to a number of home health agencies (HHAs) in the Miami-Dade, Florida area. To further address waste, fraud, and abuse, CMS is implementing extensive pre- and post-payment review of claims submitted by ordering/referring physicians; validating claims submitted by physicians who order a high number of certain items or services by sending follow-up letters to these physicians; verifying the relationship between physicians who order a large number of home health services and the beneficiaries for whom they ordered those services; and identifying and visiting high risk beneficiaries to ensure they are appropriately receiving the services for which Medicare is being billed. 

MedPAC to Consider Medicare Proposals January 8-9, 2009

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) is meeting January 8-9, 2009 to discuss a variety of Medicare payment and policy issues, including payments to hospitals, physicians, ambulatory surgical centers, dialysis providers, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, hospices, and Medicare Advantage plans.  

HHA PPS Correction Notice

CMS published a document on December 22, 2008 correcting technical errors that appeared in the November 3, 2008 notice updating Medicare home health agency (HHA) prospective payment system (PPS) rates for 2009. 

OIG Report on HHAs and DMEPOS Suppliers

The OIG has issued an “early alert memo” on “Payments to Medicare Suppliers and Home Health Agencies Associated With ‘Currently Not Collectible’ Overpayments.” The OIG’s review of a small sample of Texas DMEPOS suppliers with outstanding Medicare debt (e.g., unreturned Medicare overpayments) found that a majority of suppliers were associated with other Medicare suppliers or home health agencies, and that complete ownership/management information was not always provided in public records. According to the OIG, the results suggest that individuals associated with Medicare debt could inappropriately receive Medicare payments by omitting owner/manager information on their enrollment applications and working through other DMEPOS suppliers and HHAs. Because this initial review examined a small number of suppliers using a limited set of issue questions, OIG intends to conduct follow-up work regarding the vulnerabilities raised in this memorandum.

Medicare Home Health Payments

On November 3, 2008, CMS published a notice updating the 60-day national episode rates and the national per-visit amounts under the Medicare home health prospective payment system (HH PPS), effective January 1, 2009. The notice includes a 2.9 percent home health market basket increase, but this increase is largely offset by a 2.75 percent reduction to the HH PPS rates to account for the changes in case-mix that are unrelated to patient’s health status (the second year of a four-year phase-in) and an adjustment to the wage index for 2009. CMS estimates that overall Medicare home health payments will increase by a total of $30 million in CY 2009. As mandated by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, if a home health agency does not submit quality data, the home health market basket percentage increase will be reduced 2 percentage points. The required quality measures for meeting the submission requirements for CY 2009 are the same as those used for CY 2008.

HHA Deficiencies

An OIG report entitled “Deficiency History and Recertification of Medicare Home Health Agencies”  found that 15 percent of home health agencies (HHA) repeated the same deficiency citation on three consecutive surveys, most often related to patient plans of care. To improve CMS oversight of HHAs, the OIG recommends that CMS use existing survey data to identify patterns of deficiency citations and at-risk HHAs and implement intermediate sanctions.