Senate Leaders Release Health Reform Compromise; Congress Clears 2-Month Delay of 21% Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Cut

Today Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid released his “manager’s amendment” to the pending Senate health reform bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590). The amendment reflects a series of agreements negotiated with individual Senators in recent weeks, and its release sets the stage for a possible Senate vote on the underlying health reform measure by Christmas. Even if adopted, however, lawmakers will still face the difficult task of reconciling the differences between Senate and House approaches to health reform before a bill can reach President Obama’s desk.

The 383-page amendment makes changes throughout the legislation, including changes to provisions addressing various insurance coverage and market reforms, Medicare reimbursement policies, fraud and abuse authorities, and taxes, among many others. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the provisions of the manager’s amendment with the largest budgetary effects include:

  • Expanded eligibility for a small business tax credit;
  • Increased penalties on certain uninsured individuals;
  • Replacement of the proposed public health insurance plan with multi-state plans that would be offered under contract with the Office of Personnel Management;
  • Deletion of an increase in Medicare physician payment rates (which is likely to be addressed in a separate vehicle); and
  • Increased payroll taxes on higher-income individuals and families.

Other significant changes include:

  • Lowering the threshold for Medicare spending growth that would trigger recommendations for spending reductions by the Independent Payment Advisory Board;
  • Enhanced Medicare quality of care provisions (including the development of hospital and physician outcomes measures, the development of a framework for public reporting of provider performance information, pay-for-performance requirements for additional Medicare provider types, and value-based purchasing for ambulatory surgical centers);
  • Revisions to Medicare payment policy for a wide range of providers, including hospitals, home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, and hospices; expanded Medicare Part D medication therapy management requirements; and an extension of the proposed date by which a physician-owned hospital must have a Medicare provider agreement to quality for the “whole hospital” exception to the Stark law's self-referral prohibition from February 1, 2010 to August 1, 2010;
  • Stronger health fraud enforcement provisions, including an extension of the federal health fraud statute to violations in which a person did not have specific intent to commit health fraud, revisions to the federal sentencing guidelines for federal health care offenses, and increased subpoena authority; and
  • Modifications to the proposed annual taxes on the medical device and health insurance industries.

Note that the CBO warns that certain Medicare cost-saving provision in the legislation “might be difficult to sustain over a long period of time.”  The CBO expects inflation-adjusted Medicare spending per beneficiary under the legislation would increase at an average rate of less than 2% annually during the next two decades -- about half the rate over the past two decades. According to the CBO, “it is unclear whether such a reduction in the growth rate could be achieved, and if so, whether it would be accomplished through greater efficiencies in the delivery of health care or would reduce access to care or diminish the quality of care.”

In other important health policy news, today the Senate joined the House in approving a short-term delay in the looming - and very large - Medicare physician fee schedule payment reductions caused by the application of the controversial sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula to the annual fee update. Specifically, H.R. 3326, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for 2010, includes a provision that freezes Medicare physician rates at currents levels for January and February 2010, in lieu of the 21.2% cut scheduled to go into effect January 1, 2010. The legislation now goes to the President, who is expected to sign the bill into law.  Note that lawmakers also are working on longer-range solutions to the Medicare physician fee schedule's SGR formula, but as the health reform debate drags out it is seen as increasingly unlikely that a more permanent fix can be adopted before the start of the new year.
 

CBO Report on Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Spending on Prescription Drug Promotion

The Congressional Budget Office has issued an Economic and Budget Issue Brief on "Promotional Spending for Prescription Drugs." The report discusses trends in how pharmaceutical manufacturers market to consumers and prescribers, in such areas as detailing, sponsorship of meetings, direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising, and journal advertising. The report also discusses how market factors (e.g., size of the market, current competition in that market, and the time that has elapsed since FDA approval) affect a manufacturer’s decision to use marketing tools, particularly DTC advertising and detailing. The report does not make formal recommendations for policy changes.

CBO Releases Score of New House Health Reform Bill

According to the preliminary Congressional Budget Office (CBO) score of the House health reform legislation released October 29,  the proposed expansions in insurance coverage would cost $894 billion over 10 years.  The bill would be paid for with cuts in Medicare rates, an income tax surcharge on high-income individuals and other tax code changes, and a variety of other offsets.  This price tag does not, however, factor in the cost of legislation to avert an upcoming 21.5% cut in the Medicare physician fee schedule, which is widely expected to be considered before the end of the year.  With regard to insurance coverage, CBO estimates that the share of legal nonelderly residents with insurance coverage would rise from about 83% currently to about 96% under the legislation.

CBO Score of Tri-Committee Health Reform Medicare Provisions

According to a preliminary CBO estimate of the Medicare component of the Tri-Committee health reform proposal, the plan would result in more than $500 billion in gross Medicare savings over ten years.  The proposal by the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Education and Labor, is still being refined prior to formal committee markup.

CBO Warns of Health Reform's Impact on Federal Budget

On June 16, 2009, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) outlined the potential impact of health reform on the federal budget.  In a letter to the Senate Budget Committee, the CBO warns that "without meaningful reforms, the substantial costs of many current proposals to expand federal subsidies for health insurance would be much more likely to worsen the long-run budget outlook than to improve it."   Moreover, despite consensus about the need to make changes to make the health sector more efficient, such as paying providers for value, providing incentives for both providers and patients to control costs, and promoting comparative effectiveness information, "little reliable evidence exists about exactly how to implement those types of changes—especially at the level of specificity required for legislation."

CBO Estimates $1 Trillion Price Tag for Senate HELP Health Reform Bill Without Key Features

On June 15, 2009, the Congressional Budget Office posted its preliminary analysis of the major provisions related to health insurance coverage in the "Affordable Health Choices Act," which was released by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on June 9, 2009.  Among other things, that draft legislation would establish insurance exchanges through which individuals and families could purchase coverage and would provide federal subsidies to substantially reduce the cost of that coverage for some enrollees.  The CBO estimates that the HELP health reform proposal would increase the federal budget deficit by about $1.0 trillion over the 2010–2019 period. Once fully implemented, about 39 million individuals would obtain coverage through the new insurance exchanges; however, because employer-provided insurance and coverage through other sources would decline, the net decrease in the number of people uninsured would be about 16 million. The $1 trillion figure also does not include the costs of a potential expansion of Medicaid eligibility or a public health insurance options, both of which might be added at a later date.  The HELP Committee is scheduled to begin markup of the legislation on June 17.

Congressional Budget Office Reports on Health Care Budget Options, Insurance Reform

On December 18, 2008, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a major report entitled Budget Options, Volume 1: Health Care,” which sets forth 115 policy options for Congress to consider as it addresses health care system reform. The CBO points out that Medicare is expected to grow from 2.8 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2008 to nearly 9 percent of GDP in 2050. This spending growth will be fueled primarily by growth in per capita medical costs, according to the CBO, with the aging of the population playing a secondary role. In light of these trends, the CBO offers specific options addressing such areas as: health insurance (market reforms, tax treatment, access to federal programs); health care quality and efficiency; geographic variation in Medicare spending; paying for Medicare services (including hospital, physician, imaging, and post-acute care, and Medicare Advantage plan services, among others); financing and paying for services in Medicaid (including drug payment revisions) and SCHIP; premiums and cost sharing in federal health programs; long-term care; health behavior and health promotion; and closing the gap between Medicare’s spending and receipts.  The CBO also issued a separate report focusing on insurance reform, “Key Issues in Analyzing Major Health Insurance Proposals.” The CBO warns that without changes in policy, a substantial and growing number of nonelderly people are likely to be without health insurance. This issue cannot be addressed without making major changes in the financing or provision of health insurance and health care, which will involve "difficult trade-offs between the objectives of expanding insurance coverage and controlling both federal and total costs for health care." The report describes the assumptions that CBO would use in estimating the effects of key elements of proposals to modify the health insurance system on federal costs, insurance coverage, and other outcomes. In particular, it considers the types of issues that would arise in estimating the effects of proposals to: provide tax credits or other types of subsidies to make insurance less expensive to the purchaser; require individuals to purchase health insurance; require firms to offer health insurance to their workers or pay into a fund that subsidizes insurance purchases; replace employment-based coverage with new purchasing arrangements or provide strong incentives for people to shift toward individually purchased coverage; and provide individuals with coverage under, or access to, existing insurance plans such as the Medicare program, either as an additional option or under a “Medicare-for-all” single-payer arrangement.